.
.

Get Connected

Sign up for our free e-lerts with the latest news:

.
.

Public Interest Database

Our one-of-a-kind database will help connect you to more than 2,000 public interest groups, lawyers' associations, law schools, and online legal resources throughout the U.S.

Search The Database
.

Submit A Case

Public Justice handles only cases that will make a difference in the public interest.

Submit A Case`
.

News

Fourth Circuit Brief Challenges Giant Financial Institution JPMorgan Chase
4/26/2011

On its corporate website, JPMorgan Chase makes a noble pledge: "We are committed to doing the right thing."  Public Justice is making it keep that commitment, having just filed its opening brief in the Fourth Circuit in Donna Epps v. JPMorgan Chase Bank.

When Maryland resident Donna Epps became unable to make payments on her car, Chase repossessed the car and then sold it.  (Many consumers don't know that car dealerships often assign financing contracts to national banks like JPMorgan Chase.)  Now, Chase is trying to sue Ms. Epps for money it claims she owes.  Under Maryland law, Chase is legally allowed to sue for that kind of deficiency.

But, before it can do so, the bank is required to make accurate disclosures about the repossession and sale of the vehicle -- i.e. explain to Ms. Epps how much her car is worth, how much they can sell it for, and, if applicable, any outstanding money that she owes the bank.  Essentially, state law says that the bank can only sue for the deficiency if it provides the consumer with accurate and complete disclosures.

But Chase did not hold up its end of the bargain.  And when that happens, Maryland law takes the next step to protect the consumer: it says that if the bank fails to disclose the repossession and sale information, then the bank cannot sue for any deficiency judgment at all.  So, under Maryland law, Chase should get nothing from Ms. Epps.

Nevertheless, Chase argues that, as a national bank, it is immune to selected parts of state law (like the part that says it has to disclose information) yet is also entitled to the benefits of other parts of state law (like the part that says a bank can sue for a deficiency judgment).

Public Justice's brief argues that the bank cannot take a contract that requires it to follow state law, and then claim that state law is wiped away because it's a national bank.  To read the brief, click here.

Former Public Justice Brayton-Thornton Attorney Melanie Hirsch authored the brief with assistance from Senior Attorney Paul Bland as well as co-counsel Scott Borison of Legg Law Firm, LLC, in Frederick, MD; Peter Holland of The Holland Law Firm, P.C., in Annapolis, MD; and Jane Santoni of Williams & Santoni, LLP in Towson, MD. 

.

Faces of Public Justice

Andrea Felts - KipMalone.com

Andrea Felts

Andrea Felts was going through a costly divorce and needed some extra money to make ends meet.  So she took out three online loans. When the lenders began charging illegally high interest rates, Felts filed a lawsuit and Public Justice joined her lead counsel.

Read Andrea Felts' story.
.
Gladys Mensing

Gladys Mensing

Gladys Mensing has diabetes. When her doctor prescribed the drug Reglan to treat some of her symptoms, she began taking its generic equivalent. Four years later, Mensing developed a severe neurological disorder caused by the long-term use, which went unwarned on the generic drug’s label.

Read Gladys Mensing's story.
.
.
National Headquarters: 1825 K Street NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20006 | ph: 202-797-8600 | fax: 202-232-7203
West Coast Office: 555 12th Street, Suite 1230, Oakland, CA 94607 | ph: 510-622-8150 | fax: 510-622-8155